Moon Landing: A Conspiracy Theory

It's presently been almost four decades since Neil Armstrong took his "goliath jump for humanity" — if, that is, he at any point set foot off this planet. Skeptics state the U.S. government, edgy to beat the Russians in the space race, faked the lunar arrivals, with Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin showcasing their crucial mystery film set and found (contingent upon the hypothesis) either high in the Hollywood Hills or profound inside Area 51. With the photographs and recordings of the Apollo missions just accessible through NASA, there's no free check that the lunar arrivals were definitely not a lie.
The indisputable evidence? Film of Aldrin planting a waving American banner on the moon, which pundits state demonstrates that he was not in space. The banner's development, they stated. This unmistakably shows the nearness of wind, which is inconceivable in a vacuum. NASA says Aldrin was winding the flagpole to get the moon soil, which made the banner move. Also, it doesn't mind that space travelers have brought back many autonomously checked moon rocks. Theorists have even recommended that movie producer Stanley Kubrick may have helped NASA counterfeit the main lunar landing, given that his 1968 film 2001: A Space Odessey demonstrates that the innovation existed in those days to misleadingly make a spacelike set. What's more, with respect to Virgil I. Grissom, Edward H. White and Roger B. Chaffee — three space explorers who passed on in a fire while testing gear for the main moon strategic? They were executed by the U.S. government, which dreaded they were going to uncover the reality.
Unrealistic as the deception hypothesis may appear, a 1999 Gallup survey indicated that it's nearly strong: 6% of Americans said they thought the lunar arrivals were phony, and 5% said they were unsure.

By: Sameer Arora
Content: http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1860871_1860876_1860992,00.html